Wednesday, February 10, 2016

The 223 Nubian Pyramids

by Philip Coppens

It is hard to keep up with the neighbors, especially if your neighbor is Egypt. Hence, whereas Egypt typifies pyramids, the Nubian pyramids, south of Egypt’s border, are often seen as the Nubians trying to keep up with the Egyptians, but utterly failing to do so. 

Still, there are 223 pyramids in ancient Nubia, roughly double the amount of pyramids in Egypt. 

However, they are small in size; skeptics could argue it is quantity, rather than quality. Nevertheless, the 20th century British writer Basil Davidson described Meroë, one location in which a huge concentration of Nubian pyramids is located, as one of the largest archaeological sites in the world.

Unfortunately, all the tombs at Meroë have been plundered, most infamously by Italian explorer Giuseppe Ferlini (1800-1870) who smashed the tops off 40 pyramids in a quest for treasure in 1834. 

Ferlini tried to sell the treasure of Queen Amanishakheto’s pyramid (involving exquisite gold amulets, signet rings and necklaces) when he returned to Europe. Collectors did not believe that such a treasure could come from black Africa; they thought he was trying to pass off fakes. 

Indeed, they were jewels of great quality and beauty and often influenced by Greek art; customers didn't expect to find deep in the heart of Africa depictions resembling those of Egyptian or classical Greek art. 

Still, Ferlini found only one cache of gold and it is unsurprising that he is not too fondly remembered in Sudan today.

There were three Kushite kingdoms:

  • the first had Kerma as capital and existed from 2400 to 1500 BC
  • the second centered on Napata (1000–300 BC)
  • the third was that of Meroë (300 BC–300 AD)

Originally influenced by their northern neighbors, eventually, the Nubians were even able to invade, conquer and unify Egypt, when the king of Napata ruled as a Pharaoh of the 25th Dynasty, a rule that ended with the Assyrian conquest in 656 BC.

Though the Nubian kingdoms must have been aware of the pyramids that lined the Nile valley further north, it was only during their domination of Egypt that the royal sites of Napata and its successor Meroë became associated with any pyramidal activity in Nubia itself. That the Nubian kings definitely saw the Egyptian monuments is known from an account of Pharaoh Piye. 

After taking control of most of Egypt, Piye set out for Heliopolis to worship the sun god and celebrate his coronation as king of Egypt, before returning to Napata.

 The first series of Nubian pyramids were built at the site of el-Kurru and included the tombs of King Kashta and his son Piye (Piankhi), together with Piye’s successors Shabaka, Shabataka and Tanwetamani, and 14 queens’ pyramids. 

The Napatan pyramids were sited at Nuri, on the west bank of the Nile in Upper Nubia. This necropolis was the burial place of 21 kings and 52 queens and princes. The oldest and largest pyramid at Nuri is that of the Napatan king and 25th Dynasty Pharaoh Taharqa.

But the most extensive and best known Nubian pyramid site is at Meroë, which is located between the fifth and sixth cataracts of the Nile, approximately 100 kilometers north of Khartoum, the modern capital of Sudan. During the Meroitic period, over forty kings and queens were buried in that pyramid field.

The Nubian pyramids differ from the Egyptian edifices: they are built of stepped courses of horizontally positioned stone blocks and range from approximately six to thirty meters in height; they are, to all intents and purposes, rather unimpressive. 

What makes them impressive is the sheer quantity of them that was cramped in a small area.

What makes them a sad archaeological site is that all were plundered in ancient times, but wall reliefs preserved in the tomb chapels reveal that their royal occupants were mummified, covered with jewellery and laid to rest in wooden mummy cases, revealing that these Nubian pyramids definitely seem to have been tombs.

El-Kurru, about 13 km south from Gebel Barkal, was excavated by G. Reisner in 1918-19. The site includes, as mentioned, the pyramid of Piankhi, which has a base length of about eight meters and a slope of probably about 68 degrees – much steeper than the 51 degrees of the Great Pyramid – though eight meters is, of course, miniscule compared to the floor plan of the Great Pyramid. 

It was the largest pyramid ever built at Nuri, and is unique among the Nubian pyramids in having been built in two stages. The first pyramid was encased in smooth sandstone. 

Drawings and written reports of the early 19th century reveal the truncated top of the inner pyramid projecting from the top of the decaying outer pyramid. 

The outer pyramid was the first of a type with stepped courses and planed corners. It had a sloped angle of about 69 degrees. An enclosure wall tightly encircled the pyramid, but Reisner was not able to unearth any traces of a chapel.

Inside, Reisner found a stairway of 19 steps that opened to the east and that led to the burial chamber. Piankhi’s body had been placed on a bed that rested in the middle of the chamber on a stone bench. 

The bench’s four corners had been cut away to receive the legs of the bed, so that the bed platform lay directly on the bench. 

This is conclusive proof that these pyramids were tombs, but it is in the pyramid of Nuri that is the most elaborate structure. 

King Taharqa was the first to build in this location and his pyramid is, by Nubian standards, impressive: 51.75 meters square and between 40 to 50 meters high. 

The entrance was by an eastern stairway trench, north of the pyramid’s central axis, reflecting the alignment of the original smaller pyramid. 

Three steps led to a doorway, with a molded frame, which opened to a tunnel, widened and heightened into an antechamber that had a barrel-vaulted ceiling.

Six massive pillars carved from the natural rock divided the burial chamber into two side aisles and a central nave, each with a barrel-vaulted ceiling. The entire chamber was surrounded by a moat-like corridor, with steps leading down from in front of the antechamber doorway.

The Nuri pyramids were generally much larger than those at el-Kurru, reaching heights of twenty to thirty meters. The last king to be buried at Nuri died in about 308 BC, before construction began in Meroë. 

It remained the royal cemetery for 600 years, until 350 AD. As at Nuri, the pyramids were stepped and built on a plinth, but now each triangular face was framed by smooth bands of raised masonry along the wedges, where the sides met.

The Nubian Pyramid Age is far more recent than the Egyptian exercise. And that is what makes the endeavor intriguing.

But, perhaps unlike Egypt, it was also directly linked with the Nubian economy. As Roman wealth declined, there was less demand for Meroë's luxury goods. 

At the same time, Meroë's Red Sea trade to the Indian Ocean was lost to her better placed neighbor, the Ethiopian kingdom of Aksum. 

In about 350 AD, the army of the Aksumite King Ezana invaded the island of Meroë. By then the capital had already been abandoned and the region was in the hands of a people whom the Aksumites referred to as the Noba.

As such, in 350 AD, the Pyramid Age along the Nile truly ended. The pyramid adventure of the Nubian kings seems to have been a method to integrate their nation with the Egyptians, who themselves had, by 600 BC, long abandoned pyramid building.

The Nubian pyramids were clearly tombs, but is that all they were? The answer is no.

The pyramids were, as in Egypt, just one aspect of a larger whole, in which the Nubian kings apparently rekindled ancient Egypt’s flame.

The key seems to have been – once again – the involvement of the Heliopolitan priests, the men that have been commonly identified as those behind the original Pyramid Age. 

In a generalized way, we could state that pyramid building was a particular preoccupation of the Heliopolitan priesthood; temples were the main bailiwick of the Amunite priesthood, who had risen to the forefront of Ancient Egypt during the Middle and New Kingdom, when the capital had moved to Thebes/ Luxor. 

It seems that with the Nubian invasion – which had largely only been possible because of the demise in power of Thebes/ Luxor – the Heliopolitan priesthood was once again on the rise.

Excavations at many Napatan sanctuaries, especially at Gebel Barkal, have revealed that the temples were generally built directly over the foundations of ruined New Kingdom (read: Amunite) temples. 

About 1450 BCE, the Egyptian pharaoh Thutmose III had extended his conquests to Gebel Barkal and established it as the southern border of his empire. 

The city he founded there was called Napata. The Egyptians remained only about 300 years.

The temple at Gebel Barkal was first excavated between February and April 1916 by George Reisner and his Boston team and again between March and April 1987 by the new Boston team led by Timothy Kendall. In 1989 Kendall and his staff resurveyed the monument. 

Their conclusion was that the Napatan rulers deliberately restored religious sites that had been abandoned by the Egyptian pharaohs when they evacuated Nubia some three centuries before. 

The Nubian kings used “Amunite temples”, but converted them to Heliopolitan sun worship. But they did not totally abandon the Amunite beliefs; after all, these Nubian temples had been built according to strict Amunite guidelines, and therefore would include features specific to that cult.

By restoring the old Egyptian cult places, especially Gebel Barkal, the Nubian kings were able to present themselves both within Nubia and especially at Thebes as the true successors of the pharaohs of the New Kingdom and the direct heirs to their throne.

Taharqa was not only the one who created the most elaborate pyramid, he also transformed the Barkal site into the stage for the celebration of past, present and eternal monarchy, and the perpetual recreation of the world.

Why here? 

Due to the reverse direction of the Nile at this location, Taharqa’s tomb, though still on the “west” bank, paradoxically lay to the east, the place of sunrise and rebirth. Gebel Barkal, on the “east” bank, lay paradoxically to the west, the place of sunset and death.

An important question to be posed is why the pyramid field lay around Gebel Barkal. The first explanation is economic, since the site was seen as an ideal crossing point for the Nile, as well as a crossing point for the caravans crossing the desert from Kawa to Meroë. 

The second explanation is religious. The sacred mountain Barkal (Barkal is Arabic, meaning both "holy" and "pure") measures 74 meters, is made from sandstone and has a flat top. Seen from the west, it looks like the royal Egyptian ureaus, topped by the white crown. 

For the ancient Egyptians, the site must have been considered as the Creator God himself having sculpted the mountain, indicating it should become a royal, sacred location. From the east, it looks like the serpent with the sun disc on its top.

Watch this Amazing documentary: 

The interplay of the tomb and the mountain thus symbolized creation, death and rebirth simultaneously and Gebel Barkal, under Taharqa, was designed to be the ultimate and permanent centre of kingship in the Nile Valley. 

It was to be the eternal link between the creator god Atum-Ra and Mankind, and between the eternal king and the living king. 

We therefore find that in Nubia, the pyramid and the sites on which they were built contained far more symbolism than merely a funerary aspect – the sites were directly linked with kingship. 

And, as such, they conform to “the Pyramid Template”.

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

The Forbidden History of the Elongated Skulls

Mark Laplume is an artist and independent researcher who has been engaged in making reconstruction drawings of ancient people with elongated skulls. 

Mark’s reconstructions were illustrated in an article on suppressed evidence challenging the Artificial Cranial Deformation paradigm as the only way of explaining elongated skulls. 

Mark now shares some of his insights into the mystery of elongated skulls with the readers of Ancient Origins. 

IG: Mark, how did you become interested in elongated skulls and why did you decide to start reconstructing the appearance of these people?

In 2006, when I first downloaded Google Earth, I looked around at places I knew and then made a bee line to the south end of Lake Titicaca. I was blown away by what I saw. 

The ruins of something vast covered every hilltop for miles in all directions. I knew something incredible had gone on there, but put it out of my mind after finding no interest by anyone I tried to share it with.

Evidence of ancient civilization in Bolivia. Credit: Google Maps

About six years later, I saw one of Brien Foerster’s posts showing elongated skulls. I was lucky enough to reach him and talk a little bit about what I was looking at.

Looking at the images of the skulls made me curious as to who these people were and how they looked. There were almost no interpretations of their appearance and almost nothing about their history. 

My momentary sense of inclusion made me wonder what I could do to help him to advance our understanding of these people. Although I had not picked up a pencil in 14 years, I felt sure I could draw them to recreate their faces, to see what they looked like. 

I'd quit art school, but continued to pursue art in various ways for 18 years, culminating in working on large sculptural projects in the mid-nineties, at which point I stopped drawing and making art.

Brien Foerster with an elongated skull. Image from his Facebook page

Meanwhile, back to the skulls, I started doing online and archival research, collecting the images of elongated skulls, and drawing. To date, I have done over 5,000 drawings and collected more than 18,000 photos of skulls, mummies and related artifacts. 

While working with this incredible data and making drawings, the lack of understanding, history and myth of what these people were and how they looked did not lend a sense of legitimacy to the attempt. 

There were so many unanswered questions I wondered if perhaps this is why so few people could involve themselves with this kind of project. It’s like a wall so big, you don’t notice it or don’t want to admit it is there.

Mark Laplume’s artistic interpretations of elongated skulls 
from Bolivia (top) and Paracas, Peru

When I began this study in 2011, the count of skulls was known by very few people, who were actually aware of this. They estimated that there were a few hundreds of skulls. 

But through web searches, I’ve found literally thousands of skulls! There are also about one thousand skulls in Romania, Bulgaria, Ukraine and Chile which are not yet accessible to the public. 

Even more skulls remain unknown, as they have not been photographed (or at least are not publicly accessible) and therefore, not available for public viewing in Chile and Peru.

Elongated skulls in a museum in Romania

IG: Academic researchers are generally dismissive of elongated skulls. They see them as nothing but artificially deformed human skulls - a result of deliberate head-binding to achieve a flattened shape. In addition to this 'artificial head-modification' thesis, they sometimes also cite a medical problem called Hydrocephaly. Why, do you think, academics maintain this view? What is their evidence?

Elongated skulls are never spoken about without terms of head-binding. It’s the hole in the bucket refrain from which there is no escape. But now there are also those, and I mean not only researchers but obviously people, who’ve woken up to the layers of lies we’ve been fed since the get-go. 

Many who look at the evidence of anomalies in the skulls, are not satisfied with believing in the cranial modification dogma. People like Brien FoersterLloyd PyeGraham Hancock, not to forget Michael Cremo, examine and record evidence, rather than the stories made by earlier researchers, textbooks, and other gate keepers of conventional perspectives. The point is to keep asking questions.

The verbal portrayal of "binding" is a collective projection. The reality is that 99% of those who speak about it have never examined an elongated skull first-hand. I don't know how it's so prevalent except that it's repeated all the time.

The usual approach to elongated skulls is dominated by concepts, but the skulls’ shapes are not linguistic, they are morphologic. My work has been an attempt at making a soft rebuttal by making public my process of looking-and-drawing, which involves seeing.

I don’t rely on classical authorities. In my work, the skulls are doing the talking. Talking is a projection, while seeing is receiving. And no one can answer questions which you alone can actually experience at the level of seeing. 

This is why my approach to elongated skulls is not conditioned by the dogma “elongated = deformed”.

Left: Mark Laplume’s interpretation of ‘Detmold Child’. 
Right: Detmold Child on display (public domain)

IG: Are there any significant skulls that leave no doubt the 'artificial deformation' paradigm is wrong? How are these skulls different? Are there differences among elongated skulls themselves? Is it possible to group them according to shape and other features?

To your first question - take a look at these skulls exhibited at the Ica Museum in Peru.

Elongated skulls from the Ica Museum in Peru

There are problems with the official story, which dates back to Hippocrates, defining Huns as having been bound. It claims that all skulls are merely artificially modified skulls of the modern looking humans. 

The fact is, many had larger eyes as well as a 25% larger brain case than modern humans. Also, they had higher ears, up to ½ an inch higher than normal.

Paracas skulls (left) and modern human skulls (right)

Cranial sutures are different. There are mysterious holes at the back of the skull. An extra plate above the Occipital, known as the “Inca bone”...

The Paracas skulls have variations in the occipital bone compared 
to modern-day human skulls. Images by Lainie Liberti

There is a problem with infants too, which have been found in Peru and the Andes with a tooth-set of a three year old modern human child. Most parents will know that molar teeth in an infant sized toddler is unheard of.

Infant skull from Cusco, Peru, and Infant/Child skull from Tiwanaku, Bolivia

In South America, there are different categories or types. It does seem so, but I don’t get into (Spanish) terminology. For me, it’s just another way to separate from seeing the skull’s individual characteristics. 

I tend to say that “they had range”, like the unexplained red head that appears randomly in a family line. Similarly, the Elongated, the Huns... were wild in this way. They had a greater range, it seems, of morphological expression.

Image illustrating one of the "types" of elongated skulls

In terms of the connections between the Americas and Eurasia, elongated skulls from these areas are so similar that sometimes the only way to distinguish them from one another is by the background, or patina, on the skulls.

IG: Are you relying on any anthropological or forensic methods of facial reconstruction? Or more generally – how do you visualize the appearance of these people?

Organs come together to form the overall “body” of a head. Drawing the same skull from different directions tends to smooth out mistakes. The form arises in unison with the elements of bone, muscle and skin. Mainly, bones define much of a person’s face, so accuracy, we would hope, is inevitable.

IG: How do you fund your research? What are your future plans?

There’s a definite need for funding. When and if funding becomes available, it will greatly facilitate research and presentation of elongated skulls and it would increase our understanding of the historical significance of these people.

This has been somewhat of a slow awakening, but I think my drawings have gotten better. They were not good at all at first, although they were something at a time when we had almost nothing at all to look at.

My drawing work continues. Now I hope to gain research access to the archives of museums in Boston, Philadelphia and Chicago. To look at skulls from Peru firsthand and, hopefully, photograph their collections of Peruvian skulls. 

I am also working to produce a book of illustrations, presenting images of skulls and reconstruction drawings. In order to get a more definite understanding, studies done in Eastern Europe as well as the Andean region will be required.

IG: Thank you for sharing your story and your work.  We look forward to seeing more of them on RootRaceResearch and hope to continue our conversation soon.

By Igor Gontcharov, Ancient Origins;

Thursday, January 28, 2016

8 Reptilian Traits In Human Beings

According to Sumerian legend, the Anunnaki genetically manipulated our genetics and created three versions of what we know as mankind, today.
The Anunnaki may have reptilian blood too, as they intermixed with their creations.
We don’t specifically know how our DNA was manipulated. What we DO know is that only 20 of the 64 codons in our DNA are active.
Imagine what you could do if ALL of your codons were activated? I address this idea in the article, “How Can We Change Our DNA Right Now?“.
Additionally, our human DNA differs dramatically from all other primates as we only have 46 chromosomes compared to 48 in other primates. The first two chromosomes appear to be fused together, which may explain part of the genetic manipulation by the Anunnaki.
In the following video, Sean David Morton talks about our chromosomes, reptilians and other galactic races:
The following are reptilian traits in human beings. You may recognize a few of them in you or someone you know. Please keep in mind that these are simply TRAITS and being partReptilian DOES NOT make you a bad person as there are good and bad people of all galactic (and planetary) races.

1. The Reptilian Brain

Reptilian Brain  in5d in 5d
The most obvious reptilian trait would be the Reptilian Brain, which we all have. The Reptilian Brain is responsible for the “Fight or Flight” response which is generally based on fear-evoking actions. This is what the mainstream media news targets every time you watch those talking propaganda heads. Reptilians would appear to be very paranoid and skeptical as this is the brain they trust the most.

2. Lower than average body temperatures

Lower than average body temperatures in5d in 5d
Reptiles are cold-blooded animals, so it would follow that Reptilians are as well. They may prefer higher temperatures or do not need as many blankets at night when sleeping.

3. Lower than average blood pressure

Lower than average blood pressure  in5d in 5d
Compared to most other mammals, reptiles have lower blood pressure, so it’s very well possible that Reptilians do too.

4. An extra vertebra

An extra vertebra in5d in 5d
Some people are born with an extra vertebra, which is sometimes referred to as either a Transitional Vertebra or Cauda.

5. Hypersensitivity to light

Hypersensitivity to light  in5d in 5d
Reptiles, such as the leopard gecko, stays hidden in the daylight and comes out at night, due to light sensitivity. Reptilians would more likely prefer to be “night owls” than to expose themselves in the daylight.

6. Rh- blood type

Rh- blood type  in5d in 5d
Approximately 5% of the world’s population has Rh- blood, which was introduced to our planet around 25-35,000 years ago in Europe.
According to Dee Finney:
The Reptilians are tracking those with Rh-Negative Factor Blood. Going back into time…. the Rh-Neg Hybrids came from the Draco Caverns in the Carpathian Mountains. They were mostly red Haired, with Green Eyes and Black haired, with Brown Eyes. They tried to infiltrate themselves into the Blond/Brown Haired, with Blue Eyes, Civilization…. Rh-Negs are Hybrids. They are Part Reptilian/part human. If two Rh-Negs try to have a baby it will usually die or be born a “Blue Baby”, because it is not processing oxygen properly. Thus “Blue-Bloods”, if they survive. 5% of the Earth’s population are currently Rh-Negatives. But, they are 15% of the population of the England and the USA.

7. Lack of empathy

Lack of empathy  in5d in 5d
Some reptiles will kill and eat their own if comes down to it. Reptilians may do the same. We’ve all heard about numerous abductions and how people have tied them to secret societies and the Roman Catholic Church. Reptilians have little to no compassion for life and exist strictly to survive by any means possible.

8. The ability to shapeshift

The ability to shapeshift  in5d in 5d
Shapeshifting is a well-known trait of the Reptilian. In the following video, Arizona Wilder talks about the shapeshifting Queen of England:
Continue reading HERE

Monday, January 4, 2016

Deal With the GREYS — The TAU IX TREATY for the Preservation of Humanity

The US Government has made secret agreements with the Greys and there are many consistent indications to support this theory.

The exact date is unclear but most sources specify it happened in 1954, probably on February 20. At that time, a committee of Grey aliens would have landed at Edwards Air Force Base, with the express intention of meeting and discussing with Dwight Eisenhower, the US President at that time.

The deal has since been called the Edwards Agreement or, as Dr. Dan Burisch called it, the Tau IX Treaty for the Preservation of Humanity.

An agreement was reached following the discussions, one that would prove very lucrative for those involved. Unfortunately, the consequences would be disastrous for the rest of the world.

The deal specified that the US Government would allow people to be abducted on a regular basis and the Greys solemnly promised they would return them safely and only after wiping their memory.

But, as any abductee could confirm, this is not the case. More often than not, those who were snatched by aliens would recall the incident, in all its horrifying details.

In exchange for providing human guinea pigs, the Government would get their hands on advanced alien technology. Another ‘clause in the contract’ was the exchange of ambassadors from both sides. 

It is unclear how many participated in this exchange program, but the most famous are Crill, the reptilian from the Draco constellation and J-Rod, the Grey from Zeta Reticulum.

The Edwards Agreement was the apex of a chain of events that began in 1947, when the wreckage of an alien spacecraft was recovered near Roswell, NM. 

Inside the wreck, several alien bodies were found. This incident undoubtedly raised awareness towards the extraterrestrial phenomenon and probably gave rise to modern ufology.

In 1949, New Mexico witnessed another UFO crash but this time, there was one survivor. He was nicknamed EBE, which is short for extraterrestrial biological entity and the information he provided allowed the US Government to establish contact with his people.

In 1951, the Greys were contacted using a device built to the specifications supplied by the EBE. One year later, extraterrestrial communications were well underway, paving the road for the 1954 treaty.

On the night of February 20-21, 1954, while on a vacation to Palm Springs, California, President Dwight Eisenhower went missing. It is speculated he was secretly taken to nearby Edwards Air Force base for an encounter with the Grey aliens. 

His official statement was that he had to undergo an emergency dental treatment and he had visited a local dentist.

While the meeting did go as planned, there were some unforeseen consequences. The landing was kept secret in order to see how people would react when being put face-to-face with a technologically advanced alien race. 

The hundreds of soldiers present at Edwards AFB during first contact received no briefing prior to the event; they were the unsuspecting test audience.

This approach would later prove to be disastrous, as a high percentage of those present began suffering from various psychological ailments, ranging from dysfunctional behavior to psychosis, criminal intentions and suicide.

Over the years there have been several confessions coming from people who claim they witnessed the event firsthand. One of them is Gerald Light, a famous metaphysical community leader at the time. Light says his involvement was gauging the effect this breakthrough would have over the general public.

“My dear friends: I have just returned from Muroc [Edwards Air Force Base]. The report is true — devastatingly true! During my two days’ visit I saw five separate and distinct types of aircraft being studied and handled by our Air Force officials — with the assistance and permission of the Etherians! I have no words to express my reactions. It has finally happened. It is now a matter of history,” wrote Light.
According to Light, several other important figures were present at the meeting. Among them was Eisenhower’s chief economic advisor, Dr. Edwin Nourse. 

If he had been present, he would have done so in order to offer his expertise on the potential economic impact of a first contact with intelligent alien life. Light also said several trustworthy religious leaders had participated, their roles being obvious.

A number of other sources support Light’s claims. Notorious whistleblowers have put forward their testimonies, describing two sets of meetings involving different extraterrestrial groups.

According to former Naval Intelligence officer William Cooper, large objects moving towards Earth had been discovered in 1953. First believed to be asteroids, it was later determined they were actually space ships. 

Two different missions, Project Sigma and Project Plato managed to establish contact with the extraterrestrials, through binary code.

Cooper differentiates two alien races, the Nordic ones, friendly towards humanity and the Greys, who had different plans. 

According to him, the Nordics helped negotiate the signing of a non-aggression treaty between humanity and the Greys. The Nordics did not offer technology but rather the chance for spiritual advancement.

The treaty stipulated that the aliens would not interfere in our affairs and neither would we interfere in theirs. Their presence on Earth would be kept a secret. 

They could regularly abduct humans for medical and development purposes as long as they would not harm them. The humans would then be returned to their abduction point, with no memory of the event.

Their demands were that humans dismantle and destroy its nuclear weapons arsenal. They warned humanity about its path of self destruction and condemned the fact that we were killing each other, polluting the planet and wasting Earth’s natural resources. 

The committee met their demands with extreme suspicion and prejudice, believing that nuclear disarming was not in the best interest of the United States and that it would leave the world helpless in the face of an alien threat. Eisenhower rejected their proposition.

Another witness to the meetings was John Lear, the son of the creator of the Lear Jet, William Lear. According to him, the Nordics offered their help in eliminating the Greys’ threat but President Eisenhower turned it down because they offered no technology.

Did this meeting really take place? If so, it would appear to confirm the current world-wide UFO phenomenon. However, more than 60 years have passed since the alleged First Contact, and an official disclosure is nowhere in sight.

By Locklip

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

The World’s Largest Church (Vatican) About ETs: “The Existence of These Beings is Real. We Can’t Have Doubts.”

‘Shocking testimony’ is not so shocking to some these days, especially when you have statements from hundreds of credible ‘high ranking’ people within the military, academia, and political realms alluding to the fact that, as Dr. Edgar Mitchell says (6th man to walk on the moon), “we are not alone, they’ve been coming here for a long time.”

If you want to view some more statements, and have a look at some documents, you can check them out in THIS heavily sourced article to further your research. 

One common misconception about extraterrestrial life is the idea that it goes against religion. 

This could not be further from the truth, as in most cases, religion actually confirms the existence of life beyond our own world. For example, in Sikhism, God did not limit life to our planet, but created it throughout the cosmos.

In Islam, God created other planets similar to Earth, full of other life forms. Islam also speaks of the jinn, multidimensional creatures who can be “good” or “evil.” In Christianity there are various interpretations of life beyond our own world, and in many ancient Vedic scriptures we have the same. 

The list goes on and on, and the examples don’t stop. This is why when it comes to Catholicism, and statements coming from the Vatican about extraterrestrials, it’s not really a surprise.

For the past few years, the world’s largest church seems to have been positioning itself to be a major player in the alien debate. 

It’s no secret that the Vatican has been active in the sciences, particularly astronomy – the’ve maintained several major astronomical observatories and a large collection of radio telescopes.

“The existence of these beings is real. We can’t have doubts.”  video below:

The statement above comes from Monsignor Corrado Balducci, a longtime friend of Pope John Paul II and the Vatican’s leading exorcist. 

He has been quite outspoken about extraterrestrials, stating more than once that contact between humans and extraterrestrials has already happened. The above quote is one statement out of many that he’s made.

In 2005, Vatican astronomer Guy Consolmango stated that humankind is facing a future discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence. In 2008, Vatican chief astronomer Father Jose Gabril Funes stated that the discovery of intelligent extraterrestrial life, and its existence on a planet other than Earth, “doesn’t contradict our faith.”

The list of comments goes on and on, and as UFO researcher Richard Dolan argues:

“It is doubtful that all of these Vatican authorities would speak so openly if they felt they were in conflict with official doctrine. Quietly, a policy appears to have been decided upon.” (A.D. After Disclosure)
As for Pope Francis, this is what he has had to say:
"He created beings and allowed them to develop according to the internal laws that he gave to each one, so that they were able to develop and to arrive at their fullness of being. He gave autonomy to the beings of the universe at the same time at which he assured them of his continuous presence, giving being to every reality. 

"And so creation continued for centuries and centuries, millennia and millennia, until it became which we know today, precisely because God is not a demiurge or a magician, but the creator who gives being to all things." 

He has also said that extraterrestrials beings would be welcomed, and that he would try to have them baptized. Guy Consolmango (mentioned earlier) has expressed the same sentiment.

Vatican/Religious Controversy

Whether it’s the massive Vatican sex abuse scandal, all of the ancient texts that have remained locked throughout history (not for public viewing), mass murder, black magic, or the routine silencing of scientists, the Vatican is no stranger to controversy. 

Whether they’ve used religion as a form of control, and plan on doing the same thing when it comes to extraterrestrial life, who knows. 

Pope Francis has been making a lot of positive headlines lately, which seems to have many people confused, given the fact that a massive amount of people perceive an organization like the Vatican to be a ‘dark’ one (just as many people perceive it to be a ‘good’ one). 

This is a completely different subject, and I just wanted to keep this article on the fact that the Vatican endorses, and possibly knows about, the reality of extraterrestrial life, as do many within the military, political, and academic realms (as shown by an article linked in the first paragraph of this article).

Whether religions, or parts of religion, are used as a form of control is a completely different topic, and I’ll save that for another article.

Thanks for reading, please feel free to share your thoughts in the comment section below.

By Arjun Walia, Collective Evolution